BILDHAUER*IN DER SINNE

Emanuele Becheri, Beth Collar

curated by Beniamino Foschini

26.09 – 04.12.2020

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Emanuele Becheri, Assetato, 2020, terracotta, 50 x 50 x 20 cm

Beth Collar, Dad with Upset Tummy, 2017, Unfired clay on radiator, 60 x 23 x 15 cm

Beth Collar, Dad with Upset Tummy, 2017, Unfired clay on radiator, 60 x 23 x 15 cm (detail)

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Emanuele Becheri, Testa, 2019, terracotta and manganese oxide, 25 x 15 x 15 cm

Beth Collar, Thinking Here Of How The Words Formulate In My Head As I Am Just Thinking, 2018, Linden Holz and M.A.C. cosmetics, 20 x 17 x 10 cm

Beth Collar, Thinking Here Of How The Words Formulate In My Head As I Am Just Thinking, 2018, Linden Holz and M.A.C. cosmetics, 20 x 17 x 10 cm

Bildhauer*in der Sinne, 2020, exhibition view

Emanuele Becheri, Assetato, 2020, terracotta, 50 x 50 x 20 cm

Emanuele Becheri, Assetato, 2020, terracotta, 50 x 50 x 20 cm

Emanuele Becheri, Assetato, 2020, terracotta, 50 x 50 x 20 cm

The title of the exhibition Bildhauer*in der Sinne is a quotation from a letter by Pietro Aretino, Italian volcanic poet of the first half of the 16th century and a grim critic of Renaissance classicism. In this letter, Aretino criticizes the classicist pedantry of contemporary poets and urges them to be “sculptors of senses and not miniaturists of words.” That is, to look and build with eyes and hands, instead of resorting to practices in the second degree, especially fashionable ones. There is provocatively something very contemporary in this sentence: if we take for granted that the discourse on and of the arts has become extremely logocentric, hiding itself behind labels and terminologies of efficient and immediate use, then it becomes interesting to look at artistic paths that are probably irregular, but that tell us more consistently about the state of contemporary art.


The exhibition focuses on the two international artists Beth Collar (UK, 1984) and Emanuele Becheri (IT, 1973). Collar and Becheri’s work is composed of a constellation of mediums (both share attitudes towards drawing, sculpture, video and performance), but this exhibition focuses only on the specificity of their respective sculptural work – oriented towards figuration. Art scholar and curator Beniamino Foschini presents the artists together for the first time.


For Beth Collar, sculpture does not always respond to the image of a closed work, but also of a performative event’s marginalia. For this reason, the artist does not define herself as a sculptor, but as a performer, since sculpture is for her a double-track instrument of investigation: it’s about its tradition and her role as a female artist in this tradition. Collar therefore looks at a patriarchal history with skepticism: rejecting modernist and post-modernist narratives, despite the haunting of their ghosts, her figurative acts come to propose an intimately powerful discourse of medieval inspiration, where the reflection on the sculptural object takes on a ritualistic function of a symbolic contact.


For Emanuele Becheri, on the other hand, the discourse on sculpture brings attention
back to the work detached as much as possible from identity intentions. Always interested in the loss of control of trace in artistic practice, Becheri sees sculpture as impression on material. For this reason, his subject-matters show the abandonment of the symbolic, while generating recognizable forms, evidently coming from tradition. For Becheri, however, this tradition is something already given, something that has to do with the body, the self-portrait and the formal awareness of the history of sculpture: the movements of light generated by the material give us a reflection on the limits of plastic freedom.

In Collar and Becheri’s works there is always a complex and skeptical relationship with great narratives and the history of 20th and 21st century sculpture, an investigation that goes beyond the near past and constantly tends to question through the forms of art the sense of their respective artistic practice. Collar and Becheri are artists from very different backgrounds and directions – and their respective relationship with the sculpture of the past is evident in this – but the dialogue between the works on display has the ambition to set in motion an aesthetic reflection on current experimentation with sculpture, as well as to bring back to the center a discourse on the figurative as a mediator of meaning to the viewer.

Beth Collar (1984) is a British artist based in Berlin, working predominantly in performance, sculpture and drawing. Her solo shows include ‘End Quote’ at Stadium, Berlin in 2020; ‘Daddy Issues’ at Dilston Grove commissioned by Matt’s Gallery and Southwark Park Galleries and ‘Retrogression’ a collaborative exhibition with Eoghan Ryan at 427 in Riga, Latvia both 2019; Waldo @Mathew Gallery, New York, Matt’s Gallery, London, Primary, Nottingham all in 2018; at Standpoint, London in 2017 and at Fig2 at the ICA in London 2015. Her recent group exhibitions have been at Regatta 2, Düsseldorf, Litost, Prague, 2020; A PLUS A, Venice, The Academy of Fine Arts, Helsinki, Kunsthal ved siden af, Svendborg, Denmark, Marlborough Contemporary, New York, Bärenzwinger, Berlin, 2019; Cell Project Space, London, 2018; Kunstverein München, 2017; and KW, Berlin, 2016. Performances have taken place at Camden Arts Centre, London and Kunstverein Bamberg, 2020; Bob Shop, Berlin, 2019.

Emanuele Becheri (1973) is an Italian artist, whose practice incorporates sculpture,
drawing and video. His most recent solo shows include ’Sculture e disegni’ at Museo del
900, Firenze, curated by Sergio Risaliti and Saretto Cincinelli in 2020, ‘Stati d’Animo’ at the
FuoriCampo Gallery and Santa Maria della Scala, Siena in 2019. Group exhibitions
include ‘Ragione e Sentimento’ at the Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna e
Contemporanea, Roma, curated by Chiara Stefani and Massimo Mininni in 2019, ‘Il
disegno del disegno’ at the Museo del 900, Firenze, curated by Saretto Cincinelli, ‘Video
from the Collection of the Galleria Nazionale d’Arte e Moderna e Contemporanea’ at the
EMST National Museum of Contemporary Art, Athens, and ‘De scultura’ at Casa Masaccio
Centro per l’Arte Contemporanea, San Giovanni Valdarno, all in 2018.


Beniamino Foschini is a doctoral candidate at the Institut für Kunstgeschichte, Ludwig-Maximilans-Universität München, and a research associate at the Akademie der Bildenden Künste München. He contributes to ‘Doppiozero’ (https://www.doppiozero.com), Milano, and is co-founder of ‘porcile’ ( https://porcile.org ).


This project is funded by the City of Munich, Department of Arts and Culture

BILDHAUER*IN DER SINNE

Emanuele Becheri, Beth Collar

26.09. – 4.12.2020

Opening: 26.09.2020, 7 – 9 pm GiG Munich is delighted to be presenting the duo show “Bildhauer*in der Sinne,” opening on Saturday, September 26, 2020. As the title suggests, the exhibition focuses on the sculptural practices by international artists Beth Collar (UK) and Emanuele Becheri (IT). Guest curator Beniamino Foschini presents the two artists together for the first time. 

While Collar and Becheri work with different mediums (drawing, performance, video), the idea of this exhibition and the juxtaposition between the two artists comes from an inquiry into a specific aspect of their practice: what we can commonly define as “figurative sculpture,” which they deal with through their critical and ironic visions of contemporary culture and its mannerisms.In the process of conceiving this exhibition, a quote from Pietro Aretino, a legendary poet, critic and intellectual of the 16th century, came into view:

            [a poet should be] a sculptor of senses and not a miniaturist of words

This criticism of 16th century Mannerist poetry offers a particular stimulus for a metaphorical interpretation of the exhibition “Bidlhauer*in der Sinne” : what happens when a sculptor, and not a poet, is indeed a sculptor of senses? 

Beth Collar (*1984) is a British artist based in Berlin, working predominantly in performance and sculpture. Her solo shows include ‘Daddy Issues’ at Dilston Grove commissioned by Matt’s Gallery and Southwark Park Galleries and ‘Retrogression’ a collaborative exhibition with Eoghan Ryan at 427 in Riga, Latvia both 2019; Waldo @Mathew Gallery, New York, Matt’s Gallery, London, Primary, Nottingham all in 2018; at Standpoint, London in 2017 and at Fig2 at the ICA in London 2015. Her recent group exhibitions have been at Regatta 2, Düsseldorf, Litost, Prague, 2020; A PLUS A, Venice, The Academy of Fine Arts, Helsinki, Kunsthal ved siden af, Svendborg, Denmark, Marlborough Contemporary, New York, Bärenzwinger, Berlin, 2019; Cell Project Space, London, 2018; Kunstverein München, 2017; and KW, Berlin, 2016. Performances have taken place at Camden Arts Centre, London and Kunstverein Bamberg, 2020; Bob Shop, Berlin, 2019. 

Emanuele Becheri (*1973) is an Italian artist, whose practice incorporates sculpture, drawing and video. His most recent solo shows include ’Sculture e disegni’ at Museo del 900, Firenze, curated by Sergio Risaliti and Saretto Cincinelli in 2020, ‘Stati d’Animo’ at the FuoriCampo Gallery and Santa Maria della Scala, Siena in 2019. Group exhibitions include ‘Ragione e Sentimento’ at the Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Roma, curated by Chiara Stefani and Massimo Mininni in 2019, ‘Il disegno del disegno’ at the Museo del 900, Firenze, curated by Saretto Cincinelli, ‘Video from the Collection of the Galleria Nazionale d’Arte e Moderna e Contemporanea’ at the EMST National Museum of Contemporary Art, Athens, and ‘De scultura’ at Casa Masaccio Centro per l’Arte Contemporanea, San Giovanni Valdarno, all in 2018.

 Beniamino Foschini is a doctoral candidate at the Institut für Kunstgeschichte, Ludwig-Maximilans-Universität München, and a research associate at the Akademie der Bildenden Künste München.
Beniamino Foschini 2020
https://s3.amazonaws.com/flashissue/FwFHH7GMRLaQbY4wLzYg_5Udg3mkQyyhhQtxnezgy_cHJvamVjdF9mdW5kZWQucG5n

5 Years

Tim Bennett, Jenny Dunseath, Jonah Gebka, Andrea Hanak, Jane Hayes-Greenwood, Hannes Heinrich, Melina Hennicker, David Henrichs, Stefanie Hofer, Lukas Hoffmann, Lou Jaworski, Steffen Kern, Stefan Lenhart, Jo Love, Michael Lukas, Robin Mason, Kathrin Partelli, Rebecca Partridge, Plastique Fantastique, Berthold Reiss, Miriam Salamander,  Michael Schmidt, Maria Thurn und Taxis, Stefanie Ullmann, Maria VMier, Susanne Wagner, Youjin Yi, Andrea Zabric, Janka Zöller.

23.07 – 19.09.2020

P1030974

P1030976

P1030977

P1030984

P1030972

P1030983

P1030980

P1030985

5 Years

Tim Bennett, Jenny Dunseath, Jonah Gebka, Andrea Hanak, Jane Hayes-Greenwood, Hannes Heinrich, Melina Hennicker, David Henrichs, Stefanie Hofer, Lukas Hoffmann, Lou Jaworski, Steffen Kern, Stefan Lenhart, Jo Love, Michael Lukas, Robin Mason, Kathrin Partelli, Rebecca Partridge, Plastique Fantastique, Berthold Reiss, Miriam Salamander,  Michael Schmidt, Maria Thurn und Taxis, Stefanie Ullmann, Maria VMier, Susanne Wagner, Youjin Yi, Andrea Zabric, Janka Zöller.

23.07 – 19.09.2020

71285180-985E-477D-B87A-CEE20FBADEF6
Image: Hannes Heinrich

Diagonal

Andrea Hanak, Berthold Reiß

14.03 – 24.04.2020

 

P1030903i
Andrea Hanak, Berthold Reiß, Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030905iAndrea Hanak, Berthold Reiß, Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030907iAndrea Hanak, Berthold Reiß, Diagonal, 2020, installation view
P1030909iAndrea Hanak, Berthold Reiß, Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030910iAndrea Hanak, Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030912iAndrea Hanak, Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030911iAndrea Hanak, Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030913iAndrea Hanak,  Diagonal, 2020, installation view

 

P1030915iAndrea Hanak, Diagonal, 2020, installation view
P1030966iAndrea Hanak, Helles Blau (Light Blue), 2019, Ink ad oilstick on paper, 76 x 56 cm

 

P1030961iAndrea Hanak, Übermalung (Paint Over), 2018, Ink and oilstick on paper, 76 x 56 cm

 

P1030960iAndrea Hanak, Komposition mit Rot (Composition with Red), 2018, Ink and oilstick on paper, 76 x 56

 

P1030958iAndrea Hanak, Klein Blau (Klein Blue), 2018, Ink and oilstick on paper, 76 x 56
P1030934iBerthold Reiß, Die Prophezeiung, 2020, Acrylic on paper, 69 x 809 cm (detail)

 

P1030939iBerthold Reiß, Die Prophezeiung, 2020, Acrylic on paper, 69 x 809 cm (detail)

 

P1030941iBerthold Reiß, Die Prophezeiung, 2020, Acrylic on paper, 69 x 809 cm (detail)

 

P1030942iBerthold Reiß, Die Prophezeiung, 2020, Acrylic on paper, 69 x 809 cm (detail)

 

P1030943iBerthold Reiß, Die Prophezeiung, 2020, Acrylic on paper, 69 x 809 cm (detail)

 

 

Two artists, two bodies of work on paper. Berthold’s, despite its unusual frieze-like format, is instantly recognisable as his. His paper is very fine and thin, his wash of acrylic paint pale, uneven and mottled, his underlying pencil drawing elegant. There are palm trees, ornaments, vases and faces, standing figures and boats. Andrea’s are perhaps less obviously recognisable as hers, but certain motives and gestures persist. Her paper is laboured upon and worn; her surfaces are uneven, encrusted and often covered by a latticework of marks made with oil crayons; her colours are rich, vibrant and deep. There are flowers and bulbs, leaves and petals, and decorative foliage. 

Paper, pencil, paint and crayons — all supplies a hobby artist might use. Flowers, vases and plants — all things what a hobby artist might paint. Andrea and Berthold take on these tropes of the amateur because they find the conventionality of paper, paint and flowers liberating. It is one of the self-imposed limitations on their practice that brings to the fore the peculiarity of what it means to make.

Traditionally speaking, making belonged to the domain of the human and defined the finitude of his cognition. A paradoxical consequence of our Anthropocene era, in which our specie’s dominance over the conditions of life on earth is complete, is that this thinking of human finitude was found to be limiting. Developments in science and technology, new social and political paradigms of finance capitalism and unprecedented ecological pressures opened philosophy to questions of the post-, in- or even non-human. 

If we begin to think about making not in the familiar terms of the maker and his creation, but as an impulse, which is not bound to the human domain, then this impulse can take two forms. On the one hand, there is a rational impulse in all labour, the need to overcome our human limitations through the use of reason. This is Promethean in character in that it is the need to remake our world for the better. On the other hand, there is a vitalistic force which we share with all animal life, which has to do with our need to attract. Here we live as an intensity, always connecting to other bodies, other intensities, to produce new and complex composite subjectivities. 

I like to think of Berthold’s and Andrea’s work in this way, because it seems to me caught between these two forms of making. In their use of paper and paint, the work steps outside the tired narrative of art and genius to produce a kind of diagonal between the rational and the animalistic impulse. The almost classical looking lines of Berthold’s work are in tension with its fragile materiality; Andrea’s seemingly expressive gestures are kept in check by consistency of format and time frame. Looking further, the meticulousness of Berthold’s work signals the rationale behind Andrea’s making; the pleasing density of her work marks the appeal of his surfaces. And with my thoughts of making and finitude, I, the third participant, stand not in the middle, but split across this complex assemblage.

Magdalena Wisniowska 2020

Diagonal – speech

Diagonal

Andrea Hanak, Berthold Reiß

14.03 – 24.04.2020

 

Diagonal postcard frontAnne Rößner, M 118, 2020

 

Opening: 14.03.2020, 7 – 9 pm

 

GiG Munich is excited to open 2020 with the two-person exhibition, “Diagonal,” featuring Andrea Hanak and Berthold Reiß. Both artists will be presenting new works on paper, a key component of their distinctive practices.

But the diagonal here is not a formal device, a compositional element linking the two different kinds of painting together. Instead, it refers to their shared approach to making. In their work they show how we can get lost in the process of making, caught between the two impulses that seem to drive our need to produce. On the one hand, this is a rational need to remake our world for the better, on the other, it is a vital, animalistic force seeking to attract. To stop thinking about making as a straightforward relation between the creator and his object, is to produce this kind of diagonal between the animal and the rational.

 

GiG Munich freut sich, das Jahr 2020 mit der Doppelausstellung Diagonal zu eröffnen, die auf Andrea Hanak und Berthold Reiß eine besondere Aufmerksamkeit richtet. Die Künstlerin und der Künstler zeigen neue Arbeiten auf Papier, denen eine Schlüsselfunktion im Hinblick auf ihre verschiedenen Praktiken zukommt. 

Die Diagonale ist hier nicht gemeint als eine Einzelform oder als Form der Komposition, die zwei Malweisen trotz ihrer Verschiedenheit verbindet. Der Titel bezieht sich vielmehr auf einen gemeinsamen Zugang zum Machen überhaupt. Hanak und Reiß zeigen in ihrer Arbeit, wie wir selbst uns verloren gehen können im Vorgang des Machens. Für die Dauer dieses Prozesses sind wir ergriffen von zwei Impulsen, die entgegengesetzt scheinen und scheinbar beide uns antreiben, wenn wir produktiv werden wollen. Zum einen handelt es sich um ein rationales Bedürfnis, das darauf abzielt, unsere Welt zum Besseren zu verändern. Zum anderen ist eine vitale, animalische Kraft wirksam, die vor allem attraktiv, anziehend wirkt. Sobald man aufhört, das Machen als direkte Beziehung zwischen dem Schöpfer oder der Schöpferin und ihrem Objekt zu denken, wird diese Art Diagonale sichtbar zwischen dem Animalischen und dem Rationalen. (translation: Bethold Reiß)

Plastique Fantastique

Zero Time

30.11.2019 – 17.01.2020

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-1Plastique Fantastique, Zero Time, 2019, exhibition view

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-2Plastique Fantastique, Zero Time, 2019, exhibition view

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-3Plastique Fantastique, Zero Time, 2019, exhibition view

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-4Plastique Fantastique, Zero Time, 2019, exhibition view

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-5Plastique Fantastique, Plastique Fantastique Comic Communique:The Story of Cimon, BoDroNo, Eurnikern, NanOr/5, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, Ribbons, Plywood, Silver Blankets, 2400 x 2400 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-6Plastique Fantastique, Plastique Fantastique Comic Communique:The Story of Cimon, BoDroNo, Eurnikern, NanOr/5, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, Ribbons, Plywood, Silver Blankets, 2400 x 2400 mm (detail)

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-7Plastique Fantastique, Zero Time, 2019, exhibition view

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-9Plastique Fantastique, Plastique Fantastique Avatars: Nan0r/5, BoDroNo, Drone Monkey, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, 2200 x 1400 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-10Plastique Fantastique, Plastique Fantastique Avatars: Termites, Pixel, Funnel Face, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, 2200 x 1400 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-12Plastique Fantastique, Plastique Fantastique Avatars: Nan0r/5, BoDroNo, Drone Monkey, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, 2200 x 1400 mm (detail)

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-13Plastique Fantastique, Plastique Fantastique Avatars: Termites, Pixel, Funnel Face, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, 2200 x 1400 mm (detail)

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-17Plastique Fantastique, CIMON, 2019, Polystyrene, Ribbons, Paint, Foam, I-Pad Screen, 500 x 500 x 500 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-18Plastique Fantastique, CIMON, 2019, Polystyrene, Ribbons, Paint, Foam, I-Pad Screen, 500 x 500 x 500 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-19Plastique Fantastique, CIMON, 2019, Polystyrene, Ribbons, Paint, Foam, I-Pad Screen, 500 x 500 x 500 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-20Plastique Fantastique, Spacehex Dragon, 2019, Digital Print, Plywood, Wood, Ribbons, Metal and Wood Table, Perspex, 2200 x 1000 x 800 mm

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-21Plastique Fantastique, Spacehex Dragon, 2019, Digital Print, Plywood, Wood, Ribbons, Metal and Wood Table, Perspex, 2200 x 1000 x 800 mm (detail)

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-22Plastique Fantastique, Spacehex Dragon, 2019, Digital Print, Plywood, Wood, Ribbons, Metal and Wood Table, Perspex, 2200 x 1000 x 800 mm (detail)

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-23Plastique Fantastique, Spacehex Dragon, 2019, Digital Print, Plywood, Wood, Ribbons, Metal and Wood Table, Perspex, 2200 x 1000 x 800 mm (detail)

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-24Plastique Fantastique, Mars Earth Sigil, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, Ribbons, Plywood, 3000 x 1400 mm
Plastique Fantastique, Witches Ladder, 2019, Rope, Feathers, Dimensions Variable

 

am_Plastique-Fantastique-25Plastique Fantastique, Mars Earth Sigil, 2019, Digital Prints, Magnets, Ribbons, Plywood, 3000 x 1400 mm
Plastique Fantastique, Witches Ladder, 2019, Rope, Feathers, Dimensions Variable
photos: Jonah Gebka, Magdalena Wisniowska

 

To a certain extent we are all used to the idea that art involves fiction. The events described by a novel are not real, neither is the play performed in the theatre, nor the bunch of flowers painted on a canvas. When Plastique Fantastique presents “Zero Time,” an exhibition which deals with a question familiar from science fiction – whether we, as a people, should stay on planet earth and try to sort out our mess, or whether we should leave instead, and seek our future elsewhere – it is tempting to think that the exhibition with its video, performance and installation, is that which is fictional. But this is not what the work demands from us. The kind of “fictioning” pursued by Plastique Fantastique shows that it is our reality, and not the video or performance, which is fictional – they disrupt the structures of our dominant world order to reveal them as myth. 

It is not that the exhibition presents a fiction, but involves the practice of “fictioning”.  Plastique Fantastique is an art collective of Simon o’Sullivan, David Burrows,  Alex Marzeta,  Vanessa Page and Benedict Drew. Simon o’Sullivan , professor of Art Theory and Practice in the department of Visual Cultures, Goldsmiths and David Burrows, Reader in Fine Art at the Slade, work in theory as much as in practice, and they define the meaning of “fictioning” in their 2019 book, Fictioning: The Myth Functions of Contemporary Art and Philosophy. In their introduction, they trace the concept of fictioning philosophically through Plato’s contaminated opposition between poetry and philosophy – poetry being fictional, philosophy, having to do with truth – showing how more recently Deleuze replaces this opposition with Nietzsche’s fantastic theatre of metamorphosis. They also show how the tension between fiction and truth has been addressed by contemporary art, arguing that there is an efficacy of fiction when it is experienced as fact.  As a performative gesture fictioning is generative of social identities and relations. It brings about a truth which does not yet exist by fictioning it.

I like to understand the shift in relations produced by their performative fiction, in terms of the experience this kind of fictioning engenders.  It is not the relation of a predetermined human subject to its equally determined object. It is rather, the chaosmotic process of combining the sensory event with its network of associations, an affection and all the affects beyond experience, which it harbours. The ‘I’ is not what experiences the work of art. The ‘I’ here is produced in the encounter. When I engage with art I like to think this involves a different “I” to my everyday one, maybe there isn’t even an “I” here to speak of, but the complete participation in a creative activity. 

Plastique Fantastique creates a world very different from our own: a more colourful one, more glamorous, glittery, extravagant.  A future techonologically advanced world, but also a medieval, mystical one. It runs parallel to ours and we are welcome to visit it anytime Plastique Fantastique might exhibit or perform. 

Magdalena Wisniowska 2019

Plastique Fantastique

Zero Time

30.11.2019 – 17.01.2020

 

plastique postcard front

 

Opening: Saturday 30th of November, 7-9 pm

performance: 8pm

 

Trouble… Trouble on the ground… Extinction Beckons… Many disappear… But you survive…  Tech-animals are resourceful… Some stay with the trouble on the ground and find new ways of living… Many live in Zero City, which is not a place but an artilect intelligence, and sign up to zero production, zero consumption, zero-hours contracts… Material life becomes minimal but profitable at least for some… information is Deliver00’d in zero time… Others see a future off-ground and look to the sky… higher than the clouds, higher than where blue turns to fire, higher than darkness… to the Moon, Mars and beyond… banking on artilect and intelligence to build a city on Mars… but artilects have ideas of their own and… and make for Mars on their own, for a friend’s rendezvous… a society of a kind… so begins the first day of Mars Year Zero…

Through drawing, digital prints, sculpture, film and performance, the London-based collective Plastique Fantastique address what was once Science Fiction but now material for the news, the choice of finding ways of living with the trouble on Earth or pursuing off-world futures. In Zero Time, Plastique Fantastique tell the tales of those who choose to remain and those who look to leave, and also those who have no choice but to flee to find safe haven. Zero Time incorporates work from two recent exhibitions in London, part one Zero City at IMT Gallery, and part two, Mars Year Zero at Dilston Gallery, SPG. For the opening of the show, The group will perform a sonic fiction ‘We Live by the Left Hand of Darkness,’ about the first days of Mars Year Zero.

 Recent exhibitions and performances by Plastique Fantastique include: Mars Year Zero Dilston Gallery, SPG London 2019; Mars Year Zero Performance for ‘Today is Our Tomorrow’, Publics Helsinki 2019; Zero City IMT Gallery London 2019; ‘Shonky’, Hayward Touring Show travelling to MAC Belfast, DCA Dundee, Bury Art Gallery and Museum 2017-18; ‘They Call Us Screamers’, TULCA Galway.

 

Mit Zeichnungen, Digitaldrucken, Skulpturen, Filmen und Performances spricht das Londoner Kollektiv Plastique Fantastique die aus Science Fiction bekannte Frage an, ob man auf einer unruhigen Erde bleiben oder eine Zukunft außerhalb der Welt verfolgen soll. In Zero Time erzählt Plastique Fantastique die Geschichten von denen, die bleiben und die gehen wollen, und auch von denen, die keine andere Wahl haben als zu fliehen. Zero Time enthält Arbeiten aus zwei kürzlich in London durchgeführten Ausstellungen, Teil 1: Zero City in der IMT Gallery und Teil 2: Mars Year Zero in der Dilston Gallery, SPG. Zur Eröffnung der Ausstellung wird die Gruppe eine Sonic-Fiktion über die ersten Tage des Marsjahres Null “We Live by the Left Hand of Darknesst” inszenieren.

Zu den jüngsten Ausstellungen und Performances von Plastique Fantastique gehören: Mars Year Zero Dilston Gallery, SPG London 2019; Mars Year Zero Performance für „Today is Our Tomorrow“, Publics Helsinki 2019; Zero City IMT Gallery London 2019; “Shonky”, Hayward Wanderausstellung zu MAC Belfast, DCA Dundee, der Bury Art Gallery und dem Museum 2017-18; “They Call Us Screamers”, TULCA Galway.

 

 

project_funded

 

Maria VMier

Vier

12.10 – 23.11.2019

 

sVrg1-5_DSC0813Vier, 2019, installation view

 

3_DSC0275Vier, 2019, installation view

 

4_DSC0620Vier, 2019, installation view

 

rg1-3_DSC0639Vier, 2019, installation view

 

rg3_DSC0702o. T. [ scarlet red and sap green ], 2019, Indian ink on chromolux, 70 x 100 cm

 

12_DSC0475Vier, 2019, installation view

 

9_DSC0629o. T. [ scarlet red and sap green ], 2019, Indian ink on chromolux, 70 x 100 cm

 

22_DSC0406Vier, 2019, installation view

 

13_DSC0395o.  T. , 2019, Stinging nettles,  black plastic, dimensions variable, detail

 

15_DSC0480o.  T. , 2019, Stinging nettles,  black plastic, dimensions variable, detail

 

20_DSC0482 o.  T. , 2019, Stinging nettles,  black plastic, dimensions variable, detail

 

23_DSC0752o. T. [black ], 2019, Indian ink on newsprint, 42 x 60 cm

 

26_DSC0755o. T. [black ], 2019, Indian ink on newsprint, 42 x 60 cm

 

28_DSC0780o. T. [black ], 2019, Indian ink on newsprint, 42 x 60 cm

 

pd_DSC0816Dear Fear, 2019, reading performance

 

When Adorno was writing his Aesthetic Theory in the 50s and 60s, he could still make the claim, now by all accounts obsolete, that the experience of art is akin to the experience of natural beauty.  “Authentic artworks,” he writes, “hold fast to the idea of a reconciliation with nature by making themselves completely a second nature.” Although already wary of man’s subjugation of nature,  Adorno still believed it was possible to find beauty, if not in nature, then in art that we experience as if it was nature. He would argue we find certain objects in nature beautiful because these present themselves in such a way that allow us to do so.  Artworks are like a second nature because they also allow us to find beauty in them. Genius is nothing more than the creative principle by which this second nature can be produced.

Postmodern and especially feminist critique put this association of natural beauty with the beauty of art into question. While there might be objects that seem to engender claims of beauty, these are by large culturally determined by race, gender or class. Genius is not an innate principle but a historical concept, very much misogynistic in origin, that by definition excludes women from the production of art. So what would it mean to address natural beauty in art now? How can one as an artist approach the problem of nature?

These are some of the questions central to Maria VMier’s practice, and especially to the body of work she presents at GiG Munich, developed during her recent residency at a remote location in Uckermark, near Berlin. On the one hand, the reading she presents to us is a result of her research into the closely connected structures of patriarchy, capitalism and disenchanted nature, taking into account both feminist critique and postcolonial discourse. On site at Uckermack she would walk with her audience to various locations in the surrounding countryside to reflect on her relationship to nature while also referring to our current ecological crisis (the burning of the amazon, climate change denial and climate activism), the political consequences of capitalism’s belief in progress for postcolonial struggles in the global south and ecofeminist attempts to define the common as future sites of resistance. In her writing there is a Thoreau-like longing for a simpler existence within nature as well as the rejection of  hipster or even non-western spirituality, tainted as it is by the colonial representation of the other.

On the other hand her drawings are not so dissimilar to the paintings by Wols that Adorno was writing about more than 60 years ago. Black, scarlet and sap green ink on paper, meandering and interweaving brushstrokes – these formal elements recall the conventions of lyrical abstraction and in their modernism seem to pursue the image of a second nature. But the work also acknowledges that if this image is to be achieved at all it must be done knowingly, the exhibition constructed in such a way to expose the dialectics involved in all our dealings with nature. The meandering arabesques of VMiers large drawings are done on paper more suited to digital printouts than the handmade; the delicate smaller works are pinned like specimens behind plastic covers; the shamanistic frame of drying stinging nettles is set above a shimmering floor of the same plastic sheeting that is used to kill weeds. VMier’s drawings pursue a second nature almost stubbornly, aware of all the historical, political and personal difficulties involved. 

Magdalena Wisniowska 2019

Maria VMier

Vier

12.10 – 23. 11. 2019

 

fullsizeoutput_12af

 

Opening: 12.10.2019, 7 – 9 pm

Reading by the artist: 8 pm

 

GiG Munich is excited to present the exhibition, ‘Vier’ by Maria VMier, artist and collaborator, known for her work with Ruine München and the Hammann von Mier Verlag. VMier’s multidisciplinary practice has two distinct aspects. On the one hand there is her performative work, with its postfeminist, social and political references, on the other, her formal, abstract drawings on paper. For her GiG Munich exhibition she shows both – performance and drawing – developed during her recent residency in Uckermark, near Berlin, as part of the Libken e.V. Kunst & Umwelt fellowship.

The work is made in response to her remote location in Uckermark and the concept of nature, as well as our relation to it, forms a large part of exhibition. With her performance VMier acknowledges the feminist approaches to ecological concerns, endorsing an ecofeminism that demonstrates the close ties between the structures of capitalism, patriarchy and the disenchantment of nature. With her drawings, she subverts the traditional place of nature in aesthetic discussions of art. Utilising an abstract language of expressive signs, she shows that to identify with nature in the work of art need not be the privilege of the male genius, but can be rather, a postfeminist critical gesture.