Kristin Brunner, Christian Horacio Probst, Nina Radelfahr, Patricia Wich and Léa Manoussakis di-Bona
15.-30.09.2026
Opening, 15.09.2026, 6 pm
For the next exhibition presented at the whiteBox space, GiG Munich enters a collaboration with four of the studio artists – Kristin Brunner, Christian Horacio Probst, Nina Radelfahr, and Patricia Wich – and, in addition, one guest artist, Léa Manoussakis di-Bona, to curate together the group exhibition “The Refrain.” The refrain is a philosophical concept first put forward by Deleuze and Guattari in A Thousand Plateaus, and refers to the mechanism through which order is established, specifically the kind of formal organisation produced by behavioural patterns of living beings, animals and people alike. The refrain carries an implicit demand to shift perspective, to move away from thinking spatially, to become attuned to the intensities of rhythm. All participating artists work with rhythm, whether these are the rhythms found in nature (Radelfahr) or the open-ended rhythms of play (Probst). Social rituals relating to celebration or death are a key aspect of Wich’s and Brunner’s art practice, and Manoussakis’ interactive sound installation concentrates on the act of rehearsal.
The exhibition will be accompanied by four studio crits, during which responses to each studio artist’s work will be discussed in a group setting. The exhibition is conceived rhythmically, no longer seeing the work as objects in a space but as a means of inhabiting a landscape.
Für die nächste Ausstellung im whiteBox-Ausstellungsraum arbeitet GiG Munich mit vier der dort arbeitendenen Künstler*innen – Kristin Brunner, Christian Horacio Probst, Nina Radelfahr und Patricia Wich – sowie einer Gastkünstlerin, Léa Manoussakis di-Bona, zusammen, um gemeinsam die Gruppenausstellung „The Refrain“ zu kuratieren. Der„Refrain“ ist ein philosophisches Konzept, das erstmals von Deleuze und Guattari in „Tausend Plateaus“ formuliert wurde. Es bezieht sich auf den Mechanismus, durch den Ordnung hergestellt wird – insbesondere jene Form von Ordnung, die durch Verhaltensmuster von Lebewesen – Tieren wie Menschen – gleichermaßen hervorgebracht werden. Der Refrain fordert implizit dazu auf, die Perspektive zu wechseln, sich vom räumlichen Denken zu lösen und sich auf die Intensitäten des Rhythmus einzulassen. Alle teilnehmenden Künstler*innen arbeiten mit Rhythmus, seien es die in der Natur vorkommenden Rhythmen (Radelfahr) oder die offenen Rhythmen des Spiels (Probst). Soziale Rituale im Zusammenhang mit Festen oder dem Tod sind ein zentraler Aspekt der künstlerischen Praxis von Wich und Brunner, während sich Manoussakis’ interaktive Klanginstallation auf den Akt des Probens konzentriert.
Begleitend zur Ausstellung finden vier Ateliergespräche statt, in denen die Arbeiten der einzelnen Künstler*innen gemeinsam diskutiert werden. Die Ausstellung ist rhythmisch angelegt und betrachtet die Arbeiten nicht mehr als Objekte im Raum, sondern als Mittel, eine Landschaft zu bewohnen.
Jakob Gilg, Anka Helfertova, Julia Klemm and Jonathan Penca
9.10. – 7.11.2025
with Pracownia Portretu, Łódź, Poland
Animal Elegance, installation view (Jonathan Penca, Colonna Sonora, 2025, acrylic and gouache paint, acrylic resin, biro, pencil, gesso and ink on wood. 31 x 24 x 5 cm; Julia Klemm, A chimera is not a pet 2, 2025, steel, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 44 x 38 x 74 cm, )Animal Elegance, installation view (Jonathan Penca, Colonna Sonora, 2025, acrylic and gouache paint, acrylic resin, biro, pencil, gesso and ink on wood. 31 x 24 x 5 cm, ; Julia Klemm, A chimera is not a pet 2, 2025, steel, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 44 x 38 x 74 cm,; Julia Klemm, A chimera is not a pet 3 , 2025, steel, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 46 x 34 x 42 cm) Julia Klemm, A chimera is not a pet 2,2025, steel, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 44 x 38 x 74 cm, Animal Elegance, installation view (Jonathan Penca, Colonna Sonora, 2025, acrylic and gouache paint, acrylic resin, biro, pencil, gesso and ink on wood. 31 x 24 x 5 cm; Julia Klemm, A chimera is not a pet 2,2025, steel, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 44 x 38 x 74 cm,; Julia Klemm, A chimera is not a pet 3 , 2025, steel, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 46 x 34 x 42 cm)Jonathan Penca, Colonna Sonora, 2025, acrylic and gouache paint, acrylic resin, biro, pencil, gesso and ink on wood. 31 x 24 x 5 cm,Animal Elegance, installation view , 2025Jonathan Penca, inglers Groove, 2025, gouache, acrylic, watercolour, acrylic resin, pencil, gesso, ink and paper on wood, 52 x 30 x 5 cm; Jonathan Penca, Tufty Sequence, 2025, gouache, acrylic, acrylic resin, biro, gesso, ink and paper on wood, 40 x 19 x 5 cm)Animal Elegance, 2025, installation viewJulia Klemm, Transcending territories, 2024, glaze, ceramic, pigment, 32 x 30 x 48 cmAnimal Elegance, 2025, installation viewJakob Gilg, Alignment, 2025, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 180 x 110 cm; Jakob Gilg, Virgo, 2025, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 140 x 120 cm)Jonathan Penca, Clogmia, 2025, gouache, acrylic resin, gesso, ink, makeup powder and paper on wood, 44 x 30 x 5 cmJonathan Penca, Clogmia, 2025, gouache, acrylic resin, gesso, ink, makeup powder and paper on wood, 44 x 30 x 5 cmJakob Gilg, I’m sorry, 2024, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 25o x 200 cm; Jakob Gilg, Kindling, 2025, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 70 x 50 cm Jakob Gilg, I’m sorry, 2024, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 25o x 200 cm; Jakob Gilg, Kindling, 2025, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 70 x 50 cm Jakob Gilg, Kindling, 2025, pigment and acrylic medium on canvas, 70 x 50 cm Animal Elegance, 2025, installation viewAnka Helfertova, To be in a time of war ( I keep changing my address but war never loses my scent) 2025, bricks, stone, MDF board, silicon, pigment, ceramic, 55 x 120 x 77 cm and 40 x 30 x 30 cmAnka Helfertova, To be in a time of war ( I keep changing my address but war never loses my scent) 2025, bricks, stone, MDF board, silicon, pigment, ceramic, 55 x 120 x 77 cm and 40 x 30 x 30 cmAnka Helfertova, To be in a time of war ( I keep changing my address but war never loses my scent) 2025, bricks, stone, MDF board, silicon, pigment, ceramic, 55 x 120 x 77 cm and 40 x 30 x 30 cmAnimal Elegance, 2025, installation view
There is a fascist, who lives in my head, and he has been there for a while. I speak to him almost everyday about different things, mainly things I see in the news or read about online, but sometimes also about art. Recently I was telling him about the fish, Kluzinger’s wrasse, which reminded me of a passage I read in “A Thousand Plateaus” by Deleuze and Guattari. They ascribe to a tropical fish an animal elegance, because of the way it uses its colourful design to blend in with its surroundings. The lines of the design are abstract and yet have the capacity to construct an entire underwater world.
Look, I tell him, we think we know what a fish is, the way you think you know what a dog or horse or lion is, an animal, a species, a type. Certainly your lot has made enough statues and animal monuments – porcelain shepherd dog figurines graced your tables. A fish lives in water and like all other fish has scales, fins and gills. We can compare this fish to another and note down the similarities of their characteristics, in order to classify them, genus: Thalassoma, family: Labridae. You think we know what kind of an animal a fish is. There it is. Put it in an aquarium.
Ah, I say, but can we see the animal Deleuze and Guattari describe as possessing an English kind of elegance? With a refinement that does not seek attention, but that remains quietly unobtrusive? This involves the appreciation of the small and the detailed, like those drain moths found in Jonathan Penca’s paintings, charming us with their fuzzy faces and furry wings. More than that, unobtrusiveness requires an effort. To go through life unnoticed is not easy and drain moths have a life cycle with four stages, larvae feeding on toilet sludge before developing into pupae.
There are animals we see and animals we do not. The animals we do see, we organise and use, tame and breed. We control them as meticulously as Eadweard Muybridge did, when he set up multiple cameras to capture the image of the horse in motion or a lion in a cage, the starting point of Jakob Gilg’s paintings. We assign animals different roles: you there, you look soft and cuddly, you will be a pet. And you, you over there, so powerful and strong, you we will make into a symbol. Kitsch ceramic cats and scaled-down digital scans of lion monuments tumble, shatter and recombine in Julia Klemm’s work.
But this animal you don’t see, is something other than a molar entity, a different “affair” as Deleuze and Guattari would say, involving “becoming” not “being.” And it might seem we are meant to think this becoming morphologically, as the becoming of something else, a change from one permanent state to another, equally permanent one. A human could become a cat perhaps – or a cat, a human – as in the work of Anka Helfertova. Violence swirls around and we try to find our peace, not to lose ourselves within. To think becoming is to think loss, the elimination of all of our complaints, demands, unsatisfied desires, “everything that roots us in ourselves,” so that at the end, we are left with nothing, which is also everything. Becoming-animal is always a becoming-imperceptible, a shrinking best found in science fiction novels, the shrinking man becoming smaller and smaller without ever disappearing. Because when animals are thought in their becoming, the molecular comes into play, those invisible abstract forces that in their millions of interactions are actually responsible for constituting a world. To think an animal in its becoming is to engage with these molecular forces at work.
This is the demand elegance places on us: to think less of ourselves and more of the other. It is to be more attuned to our surroundings by paying attention to what continues to constitute us, which is always small and inorganic, indiscernible and impersonal. Elegance is a kind of molecular attention, but with a focus that opens out onto the world. To think things in their becoming molecularly is also to think in terms of the cosmos in its entirety. And then we might indeed stop seeing fish, but we will begin to see everything else.
Jakob Gilg, Anka Helfertova, Julia Klemm and Jonathan Penca
9.10. – 7.11.2025
with Pracownia Portretu, Łódź, Poland
Screenshot
In the imaginary conversation with a fascist that I seem to almost daily conduct in my head, I like to present him (my fascist is always a man) the example of an animal, this time of a fish. Deleuze and Guattari describe this fish as being “criss-crossed by abstract lines” – I like to think of the Klunzinger’s Wrasse I saw on a recent trip to Egypt, criss-crossed by a rainbow of colour.
Here it is, I would say, look at this fish, look how beautiful it is, the colours, the design. The pattern doesn’t seem to follow the shape of the fish. There is an orange line across, stripes above, more pink wavy lines around its chubby face. Very bright. But in a certain trick of the light, the fish merges almost completely with its underwater environment. What is abstract, a matter of shape, line and colour, allows the fish to become rock, sand or a bit of coral. As Deleuze and Guattari write “this fish is criss-crossed by abstract lines that resemble nothing, that do not even follow its organic divisions; but thus disorganized, disarticulated, it worlds with the lines of a rock, sand, and plants, becoming imperceptible.”
The fish worlds and when it worlds it becomes imperceptible. It loses itself in the most vibrant way to become unnoticed and thus more firmly part of the world it belongs to. In losing itself it can become everything else.
W wyimaginowanej rozmowie z faszystą, którą — zdaje się — prowadzę w głowie niemal każdego dnia, lubię podawać mu (mój faszysta jest zawsze mężczyzną) przykład zwierzęcia. Tym razem — ryby. Deleuze i Guattari opisują tę rybę jako „poprzecinaną liniami abstrakcyjnymi”. Ja zaś wolę myśleć o rybie Klunzingera, którą widziałam niedawno w Egipcie, przeciętej jakby tęczową siatką barw.
„Oto ona” — powiedziałbym — „spójrz na tę rybę. Jakże piękna: kolory, rysunek! Wzór zdaje się wcale nie podążać za kształtem ciała. Pomarańczowa kreska w poprzek, nad nią pasy, różowe, falujące linie wokół pyzatego pyska. Wszystko jaskrawe. A jednak — przy pewnym układzie światła — ryba stapia się prawie zupełnie z podwodnym otoczeniem. To, co wydaje się czystą abstrakcją: kształt, linia i barwa — pozwala rybie stać się skałą, piaskiem albo odłamkiem koralu. Jak piszą Deleuze i Guattari: »ta ryba przecięta jest liniami abstrakcyjnymi, które niczego nie przypominają, nie podążają nawet za organicznymi podziałami jej ciała; lecz właśnie tak rozczłonkowana stapia się z liniami skały, piasku i roślin, stając się niedostrzegalną«.
Rybka tedy „światotworzy” — a kiedy „światotworzy”, staje się niewidoczna. Traci siebie w najżywszy ze sposobów, by nie być zauważoną, a tym samym jeszcze mocniej przynależeć do świata, w którym pływa. W owym zatraceniu może stać się wszystkim innym.”
Dominika Olszowy, Klaudia Figura, Julia Woronowicz, Czaro Malinkiewicz, Paweł Marcinek, Przemysław Piniak, Zuza Piekoszewska, Maryna Sakowska, Karolina Szwed
curated by Przemek Sowiński (Łęctwo, Poznań) and hosted by The Tiger Room
9.05 – 14.06.2025
together with The Tiger Room at Heßstr. 48 b, 80798 Munich
Roztopy, 2025, installation view. Photo: Przemek SowinskiRoztopy, 2025, installation view. Photo: Przemek SowinskiDominika Olszowy, Suń in the Sheer Curtains, 2024, sheer curtains, epoxy resin. Photo: Przemek Sowinski Paweł Marcinek, Sick House, 2024, 67 x 58 cm, furniture, acrylic, spray paint. Courtesy of the artist and Lectwo Gallery. Paweł Marcinek, Complex Problem (Zlozony Problem) . 100 x 74 cm. Furniture, acrylic. Photo: Przemek Sowiński.Czaro Malinkiewicz, Behind the Barrack, 2024, 70 x 50 cm silicon, bandage, acrylic, prints, ink, dust. Photo: Przemek SowinskiCzaro Malinkiewicz, The Sadness that Comes at the End of the Day, 2024, 38 x 20 cm, silicone, bandage, acrylic. Photo: Przemek SowinskiCzaro Malinkiewicz, The Sadness that Comes at the End of the Day, 2024, 38 x 20 cm, silicone, bandage, acrylic. Photo: Przemek SowinskiKarolina Szwed, I Skipped the Test and Passed, 150 x 120 cm, oil on canvas. Photo: Przemek SowinskiKarolina Szwed, Spring, 40 x 50 cm, oil on canvas. Photo: Przemek SowinskiPrzemysław Piniak, Wróblok, Video, 1’36. Photo: Przemek SowińskiDominika Olszowy, Suń Clown, 2023, concrete, nappies, epoxy resin. Photo: Przemek SowińskiJulia Woronowicz, Rise and Fall of the Pandcity Universe, 2024, oil on canvas. Photo: Przemek SowinskiKlaudia Figura, Negative Sentiment, 164 x 90 cm, oil on canvas, crayon, pastel. Photo: Przemek SowinskiZuza Piekoszweska, Base for Little Ones, 100 x 80 cm, wool, plaster on canvas, acrylic, crayons, corn, raffia. Pawel Marcinek. Inner Observer with Duck, 4 x 5 x 7 cm, wood, varnish. Photo: Przemek SowinskiPawel Marcinek. Inner Observer with Duck, 4 x 5 x 7 cm, wood, varnish. Photo: Przemek SowinskiRoztopy, 2025, installation view. Photo: Przemek Sowinski. Maryna Sakoszewska, Roulette. 180 x 120 cm, bleach, oil and domestic in jeans and kitchen cloth. Photo: Przemek SowinskiDominika Olszowy, House of Little Coffee. 140 x 70 x 2 cm, stained glass, gravel, epoxy resin. Photo: Przemek SowinskiMaryna Sakoszewska, Post Mortem, 21 x 29 cm, pencil on paper. Photo: Przemek SowinskiPawel Marcinek, Unititled, 21 x 29 cm, pencil on paper. Photo: Przemek Sowinski
Jestem już na to za stara – I am too old for this. I still remember when everything changed. It was the little things that I noticed at first. At the beginning there was only one or two vegetable stands close to the tram stop across the street. They were soon joined by others selling second hand clothes from the west. Advent calendars followed with real chocolate inside (!) – then a baker – then a stand with underwear and nylon stockings and slippers with elastic bands. Dynasty was on TVP after the news each Sunday at a quarter past eight and a chewing gum cost 1.000 zloty. The next week it was 1.500 zloty. 100.000 zloty was a Christmas gift from my grandmother and I was told to spend this quickly. When I visit Poland, which is not at all often, these are the memories I carry with me and their images of the past always shape how I see the place where my parents live now.
Most of the artists in the exhibition “Roztopy” curated by Przemek Sowinski and hosted by the Tiger Room were born much later, in the late 90s, and they are not burdened with these particular recollections. When Przemek writes of the “thaw” this is what he means. I admit that initially I misunderstood. I assumed the period of transition that the exhibition refers to was the historical transition from one political system to the next. I guess I really am too old for this – I am too late. In 1990, as a ten year old child I only witnessed the beginnings of a transition. But it is this transition time, which is now perhaps coming to an end, melting away as it were, like old winter’s snow. And in the green-tinted light we can see the dirt that has been left behind. Spring is here at last – a sun is rising in Dominika Olszowy’s work! It is also there in the small drawing by Paweł Marcinek, outside his block of flats, on an advertising banner. Yet in the painting by Karolina Szwed, spring is a girl’s short skirt, a drop of liquid like a tear, tricking down her bare thigh. In the work by Klaudia Figura another girl stomps on her schoolwork with clumpy shoes. So vomit spews from the second sun by Olszowy setting in the corner of the gallery space – and from the wooden sick house by Paweł Marcinek hanging in the other corner. Two arms embrace it from behind, whether to comfort it in its distress or to stop it from choking, we cannot tell. In a small drawing by Maryna Sakowska, a gothic, multi-story dwelling is being disinfected by men in biohazard suits, after a grandmother was found lying dead behind the stained sofa. Whereas, the dwelling in Zuza Piekoszewska’s piece is one made for insects to crawl in.
There are other memories present here as well, but these refer to a past I do not share because it was an impossible future for me, the turn of the century when everything was supposed to get better, cooler somehow. Czaro Malinkiewicz’s heavily textured reliefs of silicon and paste and dirt, refer to splatter film gore and manga comics and more references to manga are also present in Sakowska’s work. Whereas we in the early 90s would try to find old copies of Lucky Luke. Przemysław Piniak celebrates this time to come in his video, dancing wildly in front of his grey block of flats while dressed in his most shiny and colourful sports clothes. Julia Woronowicz, who often reinterprets local histories and myths, has also seen the future in her painting, and it looks like Piaseczno! Presiding over this detritus of change is s small kneeling figure, shiny and black holding a duck in its arms. Like Benjamin’s angel, it looks towards us as it is blown to the future.
Dominika Olszowy, Klaudia Figura, Julia Woronowicz, Czaro Malinkiewicz, Paweł Marcinek, Przemysław Piniak, Zuza Piekoszewska, Maryna Sakowska, Karolina Szwed
curated by Przemek Sowiński (Łęctwo, Poznań) and hosted by The Tiger Room
9.05 – 14.06.2025
Opening: 9.05.2025, 5pm
Heßstr. 48 b, 80798 Munich
Julia Woronowicz, Sphinx and Foal, 2024, courtesy of the artist
The exhibition “Roztopy” explores the relationship between a characteristic Polish landscape of melting snow, folklore, and tradition, and what remains following the political, social, and economic upheavals of the 1990s. “Roztopy” translates as snowmelt, a transitional period in which one condition changes into another. It refers to a specific moment in time that captures the tension between what has passed and what is to come. The show features recent work of young Polish artists, approaching the theme from an economic perspective, the shifting locations and the resurfacing of emotions that are becoming more obvious after a period of stagnation. Just like any transformation, melting snow reveals what lies beneath. Cracks, debris, and everything else that went unseen is forced into a confrontation, just like we face buried memories. The works are connected by the notions of transgression and experimentation. This is a story about the mud we bring from the streets into our own homes.
Roztopy widmet sich der Verbindung zwischen der schmelzenden Schneelandschaft Polens, ihrer Folklore und Tradition sowie den Spuren, die die politischen, sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Umbrüche der 1990er Jahre hinterlassen haben. Roztopy bedeutet Schneeschmelze – eine Übergangsphase, in der ein Zustand in einen anderen übergeht. Der Begriff beschreibt einen Moment der Spannung zwischen Vergangenem und Zukünftigem. Gezeigt werden aktuelle Arbeiten junger polnischer Künstler*innen, die sich dem Thema aus einer wirtschaftlichen Perspektive nähern und die Veränderungen sichtbar machen, die nach einer Zeit der Stagnation einsetzen. Wie die Schneeschmelze verborgene Risse und Trümmer freilegt, zwingen uns die Werke, sich mit verschütteten Erinnerungen auseinanderzusetzen. Was die Arbeiten vereint, ist die Bereitschaft zum Experiment und das Spiel mit Grenzen. Die Ausstellung erzählt die Geschichte des Schlamms, den wir unweigerlich von draußen mit nach Hause bringen.
Hêlîn Alas,Pierre-Yves Delannoy, Lukas Hoffmann, Veronika Hilger, Ju Young Kim, Anna McCarthy, Jonathan Penca, Curtis Talwst Santiago, Valio Tchenkov, Ayaka Terajima, Gülbin Ünlü, Paul Valentin, Max Weisthoff
7.09 -28.09.2024
Temporary venue at Schillerstr. 38, Munich
Hêlîn Alas, Carrying the Earth to the Sky, 2024, installation view with “Up and Up and Up and Up,” 2024, trampolines, cable ties, speakers, sound, cables, 490 x 165 cm and “Still Faced,” 2024 framed photo print (part of a series) 100 x 70 cm. Photo: Produktion PitzHêlîn Alas, “Traumhaus junior,” 2024, caramel, 118 x 90 x 8 cm. Photo: Produktion PitzHêlîn Alas, “Traumhaus junior,” 2024, caramel, 118 x 90 x 8 cm. Photo: Produktion PitzPierre-Yves Delannoy, “embroideries on cashier’s ticket,” 2019-24, cotton yarns, thermo paper, dimensions variable (8 x 16 cm (X10)). Photo: Thomas SplettVeronika Hilger, Carrying the Earth to the Sky, 2024, installation view. Photo: Thomas SplettVeronika Hilger, Untitled, 2024, ceramic, 27 × 24 × 3 cm. Photo: Thomas SplettLukas Hoffmann, “Figure,” 2020, MDF, oak, aluminum, acrylic glass, 50 x 45 x 8 cm. Photo: Lukas HoffmannLukas Hoffmann, “Castle,” 2024, Spraypaint, plywood, screws, MDF dyed through, 100 x 100 x 200 cm. Photo: Lukas HoffmannJu Young Kim, “Almost like Whale Watching,” 2024, a pair of aircraft fairings, stained glass, rivets, LED, 240 x 38 x 46 cm (X2). Photo: Younsik KimJu Young Kim, “Almost like Whale Watching,” 2024, a pair of aircraft fairings, stained glass, rivets, LED, 240 x 38 x 46 cm (X2). Photo: Younsik KimAnna McCarthy, Carrying the Earth to the Sky, 2024, installation view with “Car Crash b/w,” 2001, analogue photograph 230 x 160. Photo: Thomas Splett Anna McCarthy, “Car crash installation,” 2024, mixed media, dimensions variable. Photo: Thomas SplettJonathan Penca, “Synanthropop,” 2024, paper-maché, plaster, polymer clay, resin, cardboard, acrylic paint, wood, glass, digital print on paper, plinth, 120 x 60 x 60 cm. Photo: Thomas SplettJonathan Penca, “Mitten Crack,” 2024, paper-maché, plaster, polymer clay, resin, wooden bird whistle, lipstick, cardboard, acrylic paint, digital print on paper, plinth 120 x 60 x 60 cm. Photo: Thomas SplettCurtis Talwst Santiago, “History of Touch” 2024, installation view detail. Photo: Thomas SplettCurtis Talwst Santiago, “History of Touch” 2024, installation view. Photo: Thomas SplettValio Tchenkov, Carrying the Earth to the Sky, 2024, installation view. Photo: Thomas SplettValio Tchenkov, Carrying the Earth to the Sky, 2024, installation view. Photo: Thomas SplettAyaka Terajima, Carrying the Earth to the Sky, 2024, installation view. Photo: Thomas SplettAyaka Terajima, “Long legs doki,” 2023, Unglazed fired ceramic by recycled clay, 60 x 100 x 130 cm. Photo: Thomas SplettGülbin Ünlü, “Karanlik isik,” 2024, wood, printed fabric, dimensions variable (site specific installation). Photo: Thomas SplettGülbin Ünlü, “Karanlik isik,” 2024, wood, printed fabric, dimensions variable (site specific installation) detail. Photo: Thomas SplettPaul Valentin, “Kasside,” 2024, site specific video installation. Photo: Thomas SplettPaul Valentin, “Kasside,” 2024, site specific video installation. Photo: Thomas SplettMax Weisthoff, “perpetuator,” 2024, sculptural sound installation, 5 objects, cable, dimensions variable (site specific installation). Photo: Thomas SplettMax Weisthoff, “out of flesh,” 2024, mixed media installation, 2 channel video, x objects, dimensions variable (site specific installation). Photo: Thomas Splett
“Carrying the Earth to the Sky” will present works by 13 artists who are currently active in the contemporary art scene in Munich. The artists were selected in a two-stage process. First each of the 37 participants of VARIOUS OTHERS nominated one artist currently living in Munich. From this group, an international jury consisting of four institutional curators selected 13 artists who will show their work as part of the VARIOUS OTHERS program in September. The jury acknowledged that the quality of the applications received made their task both exciting and challenging. The final selection of multi-generational artists reflects the desire to see art beyond fixed categories and clichés and to honour distinctive works.
The exhibition’s curator, Magdalena Wisniowska, has meticulously chosen the works in collaboration with the artists. These will be presented together in an overarching curatorial concept at Schillerstraße 38 under the title “Carrying the Earth to the Sky”.
“The earth is something human, something we keep under our feet. The sky high above is without air, where no living thing can breathe. Moving away from one to the other means letting go of the earth and constructions that belong to it – actions, bodies, objects, sensations and desires – until only the elements, disconnected molecules, remain.”
We would like to express our gratitude to all supporters of the exhibition, particularly the owners of the property at Schillerstraße 38, the Cultural Department of the City of Munich, the Edith-Haberland-Wagner Foundation and Serviceplan Group for their generous support.
Jury: Rosa Ferré (TBA21, Madrid) Luis Silva (Kunsthalle Lissabon) Nicola Trezzi (CCA, Tel Aviv) Vivien Trommer (K21, Düsseldorf)
Lothringer 13 Studio, Lothringer Str. 13, 81667 München
Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, detail Sophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, detailSophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, detailSophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, detailSophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, detailSophia Mainka, Notes on roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal), 2024, installation view
Photos: Thomas Spelt
In the summer of 2022, a Beluga whale strayed into the river Seine and began swimming towards Paris. It was stopped by a lock, refused to eat and was subsequently euthanised. Nobody knows when parrots entered Parisian airspace, but they have been observed in the French capital since the 1970s. They can now be seen in most of Paris’s public parks, from the Bois de Boulogne in the west to the Bois de Vincennes in the east. And dogs – well, dogs have been roaming Parisian streets since forever. Terriers, Dachshunds, Spaniels, and of course, the French Bulldog.
These stories of animals adapting to urban environments lay at the heart of Sophia Mainka’s video and sculpture installation, “Notes on Roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal)” produced and first shown during her residency at Fondation Fiminco in Paris. Amid the organic playful forms of the metal sculptures there are three videos, all filmed from the animal perspective. In the first two, Mainka paints her arms and hands to resemble a dog’s paws, and we see these on screen as the fictional dog walks, stops and occasionally runs around the cobblestones and concrete pavements, once even jumping from a wooden bench. In the third, she takes on the perspective of the whale, the camera capturing what the whale would have seen, providing it swam further, into the city canals. The image rises and dips to the rhythm of the whale’s breathing. Surrounding us are the sounds of birds singing, except this too is staged: these are not parrots, but a toy, a bird whistle device.
Her work then, could be described as ethological in spirit. Sophia Mainka does not imitate animals, but rather behaves like them. She scratches, she sniffs, she swims, she trills and peeps. She acts the way an animal would act, if she were a animal in this situation and in this sense, we can think of her work in terms of what the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze would call becoming.
For Deleuze and Guattari, the process of becoming-animal is best described by Vladimir Slepian in his short text, “Fils de Chien.” Written in the first person, Slepian confesses how, despite being a man, his hunger leads him to behave like a dog, putting shoes on his hands and tying them using his mouth. It is a reversal of the evolutionary process described by anthropologist André Leroi-Gourhan, in which humans, through their adoption of an upright posture, free their mouths from the task of grasping and develop speech. Slepian recomposes himself, so that his mouth instead of speaking, grasps like a dog’s. And it is irrelevant how this dog looks like, whether this is the short snout of a bulldog or longer nose of a dachshund.
Similarly, Mainka makes us rethink our relation to nature, which is redrawn along affective lines as a participatory process. Animals are not considered as distinct molar entities, standing alongside the human. All entities are defined by their capacity to act, which changes depending on how they affect and how they are affected by others. There is a sensing of utopia in the environs of the Canal Saint-Martin that Mainka would walk along so happily – a secluded, sheltered place of inter-species co-existence. Or rather, it is a place where different populations, human, mammal and bird, continually compose and re-compose together.
Im Sommer 2022 verirrte sich ein Belugawal in die Seine und begann, in Richtung Paris zu schwimmen. Er geriet in eine Schleuse, fraß nicht mehr und wurde daraufhin eingeschläfert. Seit wann genau Papageien sich im Pariser Luftraum angesiedelt haben, ist unklar, aber sie werden seit den 1970ern in der französischen Hauptstadt beobachtet. Heute kann man sie in den meisten öffentlichen Parks der Stadt entdecken, vom Bois de Boulogne im Westen bis zum Bois de Vincennes im Osten. Und Hunde – nun ja, Hunde streifen seit jeher durch die Pariser Straßen, ob Terrier, Dackel, Spaniel und natürlich die französische Bulldogge.
Diese Erzählungen von Tieren, welche sich an urbane Lebensräume anpassen, stehen im Zentrum von Sophia Mainkas Installation “Notes on Roommates (a dog, a parrot, a whale and a canal)“ aus Videos und Skulpturen, die während ihres Residenzaufenthalts in der Fondation Fiminco in Paris produziert und dort auch zum ersten Mal gezeigt wurde. In die organischen und spielerischen Formen der Metallskulpturen sind drei Videos integriert, alle aufgenommen aus der Tierperspektive. Im ersten und zweiten Video sind Mainkas Arme und Hände wie Hundepfoten bemalt. Wir nehmen den Blickwinkel jenes fiktiven Hundes ein, laufen mit ihm über Kopfsteinpflaster und Bürgersteige, halten plötzlich an, rennen hin und her und springen einmal sogar von einer Holzbank. Im dritten Video nimmt Mainka die Perspektive des Wals ein, wobei die Kamera das wiedergibt, was jener wohl gesehen hätte, wenn er weiter in die Stadt hinein geschwommen wäre. Das Bild bewegt sich im Rhythmus der Atmung des Wals. Um uns herum erklingt Vogelgezwitscher, aber auch das ist eine Inszenierung: Es sind keine Papageien, sondern ein Spielzeug, eine Vogelpfeife.
Man könnte Sophia Mainkas Arbeit durchaus als ethologisch bezeichnen. Die Künstlerin imitiert keine Tiere, sondern verhält sich wie sie. Sie kratzt, schnüffelt, schwimmt, trällert und piepst. Sie verhält sich so, wie ein Tier sich verhalten würde, wenn sie ein Tier in dieser Situation wäre, und wir können ihre Arbeit im Sinne dessen betrachten, was der französische Philosoph Gilles Deleuze als Werden bezeichnen würde. Am besten wird der Prozess der Tierwerdung für Deleuze und Guattari von Vladimir Slepian in seinem kurzen Text “Fils de Chien“ beschrieben. In der ersten Person verfasst, bekennt Slepian, dass er sich, obwohl er ein Mann sei, aus Hunger wie ein Hund benehme, indem er sich Schuhe an die Hände binde und sie mit dem Maul zubinde. Dies ist eine Umkehrung des vom Anthropologen André Leroi-Gourhan beschriebenen evolutionären Prozesses, bei dem der Mensch durch die Entwicklung einer aufrechten Körperhaltung seinen Mund von der Aufgabe des Greifens befreit und Sprache entwickelt. Slepian setzt sich neu zusammen, so dass sein Mund nicht mehr spricht, sondern wie der eines Hundes zupackt. Dabei ist es unerheblich, wie dieser Hund aussieht, ob er die kurze Schnauze einer Bulldogge oder die längere Nase eines Dackels hat.
In ähnlicher Weise regt Mainka uns dazu an, unsere Beziehung zur Natur zu überdenken, wobei dieses Verhältnis entlang affektiver Linien zu einem partizipatorischen Prozess umgestaltet wird. Tiere werden nicht als getrennte molare Einheiten neben dem Menschen betrachtet, sondern alle Lebewesen werden durch ihre Handlungsfähigkeit definiert, die sich verändert, je nachdem, wie sie auf andere einwirken und wie sie von anderen beeinflusst werden. In der Umgebung des Canal Saint-Martin, an dem Mainka so gerne spazieren geht, ist ein Hauch von Utopie zu spüren – ein beschützter, ruhiger Ort, an dem verschiedene Arten koexistieren. Oder genauer gesagt: Es ist ein Ort, an dem sich verschiedene Spezien, ob Menschen, Säugetiere oder Vögel, immer wieder neu zusammensetzen.
Kindly invited by Sperling Munich, Regerplatz 9, 81541 München
Throw of the dice, 2024, installation view. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Throw of the dice, 2024, installation view. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Throw of the dice, 2024, installation view. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Sophia Mainka, Oracle des Plantes series, 2024, silicone on cotton, 75 x 57 x 1 cm each. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Sophia Mainka, Tarot (Wheel of Fortune), 2924, silicone on cotton, 190 x 121 x 1 cm. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Sophia Mainka, Tarot (Wheel of Fortune), 2924, silicone on cotton, 190 x 121 x 1 cm (detail). Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Lukas Hoffmann, Pan, MDF, paper, wood, spray-paint, 41 x 22 x 19 cm. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Throw off the dice, 2024, installation view. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Lukas Hoffmann, Schloss, 2024, paper, wood, screws, spray-paint, 158 x 102 x 75 cm. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Lukas Hoffmann, Schloss, 2024, paper, wood, screws, spray-paint, 158 x 102 x 75 cm. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Lukas Hoffmann, Schloss, 2024, paper, wood, screws, spray-paint, 158 x 102 x 75 cm (detail). Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Lukas Hoffmann, Schloss, 2024, paper, wood, screws, spray-paint, 158 x 102 x 75 cm (detail). Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.Sophia Mainka, We used to be wild, 2024, video loop (full HD, stereo), 17 min & 17 sec. Photo: Sebastian Kissel, courtesy Sperling, Munich.
Throw of the dice – down a slippery slope
A standard game of dice is not a game of chance. At stake is probability, the odds of throwing this or that number, easily calculable. This is why we often lose, as the fable famously forewarns.[1] The young man inherits an estate and quickly gambles it away. In one sweep an entire forest is laid low. Is bad luck to blame? No, replies Fortune to an angry Pan. Just the foolishness of man.
A game of chance takes place on a far more slippery slope, like the round of croquet played in Alice in Wonderland, a game of cards of sorts.[2] Flamingos are mallets and a hedgehog is a ball. Whenever Alice wants to hit the hedgehog with the flamingo’s head, the bird turns floppy and spins round to look at her so comically that she laughs. And when she finally gets the flamingo’s head down, the hedgehog crawls away. In this game, cards move away from us and the players play all at once, quarrelling and fighting while the queen screams, “Off with their heads! Off with their heads!” For in a real game of chance, anything can happen. This would be the challenge: throwing the dice without knowing the rules of the game. To continue throwing the dice while accepting that each time the rules of the game change.
This is Nietzsche’s divine game, played across two tables, the earth and the sky.[3] Each time the dice is thrown the earth trembles, because the dice returns to us as divine. At that moment when the dice hover briefly in the air, they belong to the gods and all is possible. Our task is to affirm the entirety of possibility, any fate the gods prepared for us, cooking all of chance in one pot.[4] In this forest, we must wander bewildered and wild.[5]
In the exhibition, Sophia Mainka shows a series of wall mounted works made from silicone paste. Heavy and solid, yet curiously slippery, they are based on a Tarot deck of cards. It is peculiarly appropriate that the largest is the wheel of fortune, usually interpreted as standing for change or becoming. Fortune can be good or bad depending on the game, the question asked of the cards, open to interpretation. In Tarot, one card can mean many things and then change meaning at different times. In contrast, destiny is the thread woven through the image and cut by the three mythological sisters. The turn of the card is always fateful. Whatever the outcome of the roll of dice, this outcome is necessarily so: sky back to earth, slide and snip.
Perhaps then, we wander not quite so bewildered in this forest, as we necessarily follow our fate. But we wander on a surface without ground or depth, because free of cause. Everything in Mainka’s work takes place on the surface, like the hybrid creature scuttering around the ornate interiors of the Musée de la Chasse et de la Nature in her video. It imitates not animals, but depictions of them. The two talking dogs are not half-human but half-sculpture, their head and paws the same silicone as Mainka’s wall pieces. In Nazim Bakour’s music score, they do not bark, but whoop with the sound of the cuica drum.
Lukas Hoffmann too stages a fictional world that has something of Lewis Carroll’s unsettling absurdity about it. There is a wooden castle with ears, eyes, a wide open mouth and a nose, and it is both too big and too small. Drink me, eat this, nibble both sides of the mushroom circle. As Alice grows bigger, her initial self also becomes smaller, pulled in both directions at once. With components jutting out and sliding in, the body both outside and inside, the castle too grows small as it becomes big. “Becoming without measure, a veritable becoming-mad.”[6] Observing this madness is the upside down head of Pan, the mischievous god of the wild. A mascaron fallen from its pediment. Run away in panic, it urges us – run away in chaos, it smiles.
[3] Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, Book III, “Before Sunrise”, trans. Kaufmann, p.166cd and “The Seven Seals” 3, p. 258. See also Deleuze’s reading in Gilles Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy, trans. Hugh Tomlinson, (London and New York: Continuum, 2002) p. 25–7.
[4] Zarathustra, Book III “The Bedwarfing Virtue” 3, p. 189.